Chapter
Two was kind of confusing for me, but by the end of the chapter I finally was
able to make sense of it. While reading the second chapter of Slaughterhouse
Five, I was able to pick up on many example of Indirect Characterization. The first example was one that the narrator gave that was a description of
Billy, “ He was a funny-looking child who became a funny-looking youth—tall and
weak, and shaped like a bottle of Coca-Cola” (Vonnegut 23). This was one of the
first times when I was starting to become confused. This seemed to me as if the
narrator was just giving the reader a basic description of Billy; however, what
Vonnegut was getting at here was to show that Billy was not physically gifted
in any way and seemed to be unfit or incapable of fighting in a war.
Billy’s experience after his involvement in the airplane
crash was another example of Indirect
Characterization that I came across while reading chapter two of
Slaughterhouse Five. Vonnegut describes Billy, after the crash, by saying,
“When Billy finally got home to Illium after the airplane crash, he was quiet
for a while… He didn’t resume practice” (Vonnegut 25). This description of
Billy shows us that that crash had some damaging and long lasting scars that
deeply affected his mind and his personality. Personally, I feel in a way this
may have something to do with the time traveling and endless loops throughout
time. This explains that after the crash, Billy would not be the same mentally
or emotionally ever again
No comments:
Post a Comment